In re Rochelle

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Rochelle

252 So. 3d 456

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 14, 2018

DocketNO. 2018-B-1150

StatusPublished

This text of 252 So. 3d 456 (In re Rochelle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rochelle, 252 So. 3d 456 (La. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent certified in his official capacity as a notary that the parties to an act of donation signed the instrument in his presence, when in fact they did not. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Joseph Burchman Rochelle, Louisiana Bar Roll number 32230, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent certified in his official capacity as a notary that the parties to an act of donation signed the instrument in his presence, when in fact they did not. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Joseph Burchman Rochelle, Louisiana Bar Roll number 32230, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 So. 3d 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rochelle-la-2018.