In re Robison

Utah Supreme Court

In re Robison

221 P. 567, 62 Utah 597, 1923 Utah LEXIS 139

Utah Supreme Court·Decided December 13, 1923·No. Nos. 3947, 3948·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[598]*598Proctor H. Eobison and George E. Eobison were tbe litigants wbo swore to the affidavits referred to in the preceding opinion. Both were adjudged guilty of contempt of court and each sentenced to pay a fine. They separately appeal. These two cases, together with the Schulder Case, 62 Utah, 591, 221 Pac. 565, were argued and submitted together. The facts sufficiently appear in the Schulder Case. On the authority of that case and the authorities cited in the opinion, the judgment of the district court in each of these two cases is affirmed, with costs to be taxed against appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

[598]*598Proctor H. Eobison and George E. Eobison were tbe litigants wbo swore to the affidavits referred to in the preceding opinion. Both were adjudged guilty of contempt of court and each sentenced to pay a fine. They separately appeal. These two cases, together with the Schulder Case, 62 Utah, 591, 221 Pac. 565, were argued and submitted together. The facts sufficiently appear in the Schulder Case. On the authority of that case and the authorities cited in the opinion, the judgment of the district court in each of these two cases is affirmed, with costs to be taxed against appellants.

In re Robison, 221 P. 567, 62 Utah 597, 1923 Utah LEXIS 139 (Utah 1923).

Pincite

221 P. 567 (In re Robison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related