In Re: Robinson v.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2004·No. 04-4613·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4613

In Re: GARY ROBINSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-02-253-WMN)

Submitted: September 8, 2004 Decided: October 22, 2004

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Gary Robinson petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging

the district court has unduly delayed acting on his post-judgment

of conviction motions. He seeks an order from this court directing

the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay

in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant Robinson

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for writ

of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Robinson v., (4th Cir. 2004).

In Re: Robinson v. (In Re: Robinson v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.