In re Robinson
123 F. 844, 1903 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 257
Opinion
I am of the opinion that the second, eleventh, and twelfth specifications of objections to the bankrupt’s discharge are sustained by the evidence. After submission of the case to the court upon evidence which fully supports and verifies certain of the specifications, the objection to the specifications for lack of verification is too late, and cannot be considered as a sufficient ground for dismissing the specifications and granting the discharge. Brandenburgh on Bankruptcy (3d Ed.) § 348, p. 228.
Petition for discharge is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Robinson, 123 F. 844, 1903 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 257 (D.R.I. 1903).
123 F. 844 (In re Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Taylor
188 F. 479 (N.D. Alabama, 1911)