In re Robinson

E.D. Pennsylvania

In re Robinson

68 B.R. 29, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 4851

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 8, 1986

DocketBankruptcy No. 86-01798G

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 B.R. 29 (In re Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Robinson, 68 B.R. 29, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 4851 (Pa. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION AND ORDER

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Chief Judge:

The issue before us arises out of the claim of The Philadelphia Savings Fund Society (now named Meritor Savings Bank) for post-petition interest on its secured claim at the contract rate to the extent of its security.

This question having been before us on four prior occasions (In re Robert A. Evans, 20 B.R. 175; In re Einspahr, 30 B.R. 356; In re McCall, 57 B.R. 642; In re Nesmith, 57 B.R. 348) we see no reason for repeating the rationale we have set forth in those cases.

An appropriate order follows.

ORDER

AND NOW, to wit, this 8th day of December, 1986, it is hereby

ORDERED that Philadelphia Savings Fund Society (now named Meritor Savings Bank) is entitled to receive post-petition interest on its secured claim, at the rate of 11% as set forth in its mortgage note; and it is further

[30]*30ORDERED that the debtor’s objections to Philadelphia Savings Fund Society’s claim are hereby DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI