In re Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Robinson

259 A.D. 299, 19 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6124

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 1940·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record conclusively establishes that the respondent instituted a number of unfounded actions for the sole purpose of harassing and annoying persons against whom he had a real or fancied grievance. Giving due consideration to his long career at the bar this court believes a censure is proper punishment.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent censured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record conclusively establishes that the respondent instituted a number of unfounded actions for the sole purpose of harassing and annoying persons against whom he had a real or fancied grievance. Giving due consideration to his long career at the bar this court believes a censure is proper punishment.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent censured.

In re Robinson, 259 A.D. 299, 19 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 299 (In re Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.