In Re Robinson
This text of In Re Robinson (In Re Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE CYNTHIA Y. ROBINSON, JEFFREY S. LOUTIT, and MICHELLE M. FREEMER ____________________
2011-1277 (Serial No. 12/020,068) ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
KEVIN M. FLOWERS, Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellants. On the brief were LI-HEIEN RIN LAURES and SHELLEY C. DANEK.
SYDNEY O. JOHNSON, JR. Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief was RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor. Of counsel was BRIAN T. RACILLA, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (BRYSON, DYK, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Robinson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robinson-cafc-2012.