In re Robinson

Fourth Circuit

In re Robinson

111 F. App'x 190

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2004·No. No. 04-4613·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gary Robinson petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his post-judgment of conviction motions. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant Robinson leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gary Robinson petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his post-judgment of conviction motions. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant Robinson leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

In re Robinson, 111 F. App'x 190 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

111 F. App'x 190 (In re Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.