In re Robins
This text of 243 A.D. 548 (In re Robins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The executor and executrix nominated in the will of the testator appeal from the decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county settling their account upon the ground that they are entitled to full commissions in each of their capacities as executors and trustees. Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent payable out of the estate. In our judgment the duties imposed upon the trustees were concurrent or coexistent with their duties as executors and, therefore, they are not entitled at this time to one-half commissions for paying out principal. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Cars-well, Scudder and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robins-nyappdiv-1934.