In re Robinette J. S. F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Robinette J. S. F.

51 A.D.2d 571, 378 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10847

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 571 (In re Robinette J. S. F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Robinette J. S. F., 51 A.D.2d 571, 378 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a neglect proceeding pursuant to article 6 of the Family Court Act, the appellant, Sheila B. (Anonymous), appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated May 19, 1975, which, after a hearing, (1) adjudged that her daughter Robinette J. S. F. (Anonymous) is a permanently neglected child, (2) terminated her custody of the said child and (3) awarded custody of the child to the Jewish Child Care Association, with a direction that the said association take all necessary steps to commence an adoption proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. The evidence supports the Family Court’s finding that the appellant natural mother failed to plan for the future of the child (see Family Ct. Act, § 611). Gulotta, P. J., Latham, Margett, Damiani and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a neglect proceeding pursuant to article 6 of the Family Court Act, the appellant, Sheila B. (Anonymous), appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated May 19, 1975, which, after a hearing, (1) adjudged that her daughter Robinette J. S. F. (Anonymous) is a permanently neglected child, (2) terminated her custody of the said child and (3) awarded custody of the child to the Jewish Child Care Association, with a direction that the said association take all necessary steps to commence an adoption proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. The evidence supports the Family Court’s finding that the appellant natural mother failed to plan for the future of the child (see Family Ct. Act, § 611). Gulotta, P. J., Latham, Margett, Damiani and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 571, 378 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robinette-j-s-f-nyappdiv-1976.