In Re Robertson

Supreme Court

In Re Robertson

156 U.S. 183, 15 S. Ct. 324, 39 L. Ed. 389, 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2121

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 22, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 156 U.S. 183 (In Re Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Robertson, 156 U.S. 183, 15 S. Ct. 324, 39 L. Ed. 389, 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2121 (1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller,

after stating the case, delivered • the opinion of the court.

Applications to this court for a writ of error to a state court are not entertained unless at the request of one of the members of the court concurred in by his associates. In this case there seems to' have been some misunderstanding on the part of counsel as to the practice, in view of Avhich, and considering that this is a capital case and thát the day appointed for the *185 execution of the sentence is very near, we have examined the application, and are of opinion that the question of the sufficiency of the indictment is not a Federal question, and that no Federal question appears upon the record to have been presented to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, and therefore, upon the authority of Leeper v. Texas. 139 U. S. 462, and Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 377,

The writ of error is not allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller,

after stating the case, delivered • the opinion of the court.

Applications to this court for a writ of error to a state court are not entertained unless at the request of one of the members of the court concurred in by his associates. In this case there seems to' have been some misunderstanding on the part of counsel as to the practice, in view of Avhich, and considering that this is a capital case and thát the day appointed for the *185 execution of the sentence is very near, we have examined the application, and are of opinion that the question of the sufficiency of the indictment is not a Federal question, and that no Federal question appears upon the record to have been presented to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, and therefore, upon the authority of Leeper v. Texas. 139 U. S. 462, and Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 377,

The writ of error is not allowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 U.S. 183, 15 S. Ct. 324, 39 L. Ed. 389, 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robertson-scotus-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack