In re Roberts

18 S.W.3d 736, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 1523, 2000 WL 254338
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 8, 2000·No. No. 04-00-00129-CV·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The court has considered the relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and the relator’s motion for emergency relief, and is of the opinion that relief should be denied because the trial court’s ruling on a motion to show authority can be remedied by appeal. See State Board of Insurance v. Williams, 736 S.W.2d 259, 260 (Tex.App.—Austin 1987, no writ) (denying mandamus relief because error in ruling on motion to show authority could be remedied by appeal). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and request for temporary relief are denied. Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Roberts, 18 S.W.3d 736, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 1523, 2000 WL 254338 (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

18 S.W.3d 736 (In re Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related