In re Roberts
This text of 18 S.W.3d 736 (In re Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The court has considered the relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and the relator’s motion for emergency relief, and is of the opinion that relief should be denied because the trial court’s ruling on a motion to show authority can be remedied by appeal. See State Board of Insurance v. Williams, 736 S.W.2d 259, 260 (Tex.App.—Austin 1987, no writ) (denying mandamus relief because error in ruling on motion to show authority could be remedied by appeal). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and request for temporary relief are denied. Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 S.W.3d 736, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 1523, 2000 WL 254338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roberts-texapp-2000.