In re Roberts

489 S.E.2d 480, 327 S.C. 261, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 172
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedAugust 22, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 489 S.E.2d 480 (In re Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Roberts, 489 S.E.2d 480, 327 S.C. 261, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 172 (S.C. 1997).

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent has been indicted for acceptance of a bribe as an executive officer in violation S.C.Code Ann. § 16-9-220 (1985). The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has petitioned to have respondent placed on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent has not filed a return.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is placed on interim suspension until further order of this Court.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, J.

/s/ James E. Moore, J.

/s/ John H Waller, Jr., J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Roberts
503 S.E.2d 160 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 S.E.2d 480, 327 S.C. 261, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roberts-sc-1997.