In re Roberts

842 N.E.2d 1293, 2006 Ind. LEXIS 178, 2006 WL 523627
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 27, 2006
DocketNo. 49S00-0409-DI-414
StatusPublished

This text of 842 N.E.2d 1293 (In re Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Roberts, 842 N.E.2d 1293, 2006 Ind. LEXIS 178, 2006 WL 523627 (Ind. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER APPROVING STATEMENT OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDITIONAL AGREEMENT FOR DISCIPLINE

Pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 11, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and the respondent have submitted for approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline stipulating agreed facts and proposed discipline as summarized below:

Facts: In two separate instances, while serving as a public defender, respondent was responsible for appeals on behalf of his clients. In both cases, respondent failed to timely notify his clients that the Court of Appeals had affirmed the clients' convictions. As a result, the clients' right to petition for transfer was lost.

Violations: By his conduct respondent violated Ind. Professional Conduct Rule 1.3, which requires a lawyer to act with reasonable diligence and promptness, and Prof.Cond.R. 1.4(b), which requires a lawyer to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions

Discipline: Thirty (80) days suspension from the practice of law with automatic reinstatement thereafter.

The Court, having considered the submission of the parties, now APPROVES and ORDERS the agreed discipline. The respondent, Kenneth T. Roberts, is suspended from the practice of law for thirty (80) days, commencing April 15, 2006, with automatic reinstatement thereafter. Costs of this proceeding are assessed against the respondent. The Court further finds that with the acceptance of this agreement the hearing officer appointed in this case is discharged.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the hearing officer and in accordance with the provisions of Admis.Dise.R. 28, Section 3(d).

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
842 N.E.2d 1293, 2006 Ind. LEXIS 178, 2006 WL 523627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roberts-ind-2006.