In Re Roberts

34 Haw. 759, 1939 Haw. LEXIS 38
CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 16, 1939
DocketNo. 1849.
StatusPublished

This text of 34 Haw. 759 (In Re Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Roberts, 34 Haw. 759, 1939 Haw. LEXIS 38 (haw 1939).

Opinion

Per Ouriam.

On October 5,1928, a judgment of disbarment was entered herein against Claus L. Roberts, an attorney licensed to practice in the district courts of the Territory. (See 30 Haw. 588.) Mr. Roberts has now filed his petition for reinstatement based upon the affidavit of himself and others and a petition in his behalf signed quite generally by members of the bar of Honolulu. The petition was referred to Honorable J. Y. Hodgson, attorney general *760 of the Territory, who appeared at the hearing and signified his assent to the prayer of the petition and it appears that Mr. Roberts has at all times since his disbarment as aforesaid faithfully observed the former judgment of this court and has deported himself with commendable propriety and no objection being offered the petition will be granted and an order to that effect will be made on presentation.

W. H. Seen for the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Roberts
30 Haw. 588 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Haw. 759, 1939 Haw. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roberts-haw-1939.