In re Roberts
This text of In re Roberts (In re Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
No. 22-BG-12
IN RE MARGOT ELIZABETH ROBERTS 2021 DDN 225 A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Bar Registration No. 1048379
BEFORE: Glickman and Easterly, Associate Judges, and Washington, Senior Judge.
ORDER (FILED— March 31, 2022)
On consideration of the certified copy of the order from the state of Maryland placing respondent on inactive disability status by consent; this court’s February 7, 2022, order suspending respondent and directing her to show cause why she should not be indefinitely suspended under D.C. Bar R. XI § 13(e) as reciprocal discipline, no response having been filed; respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, §14(g) affidavit; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel, and it is
ORDERED that Margot Elizabeth Roberts is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(e), nunc pro tunc to March 21, 2022. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(g) for reinstatement, as well the provisions of Rule XI § 16(c) dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re Roberts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roberts-dc-2022.