In re Roberts
169 F. 1022, 94 C.C.A. 668, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4653
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedApril 13, 1909
DocketNo. 247
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 169 F. 1022 (In re Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Roberts, 169 F. 1022, 94 C.C.A. 668, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4653 (2d Cir. 1909).
Opinion
The state suit is brought against the Receiver and his. clerk personally. The question raised here has already been decided by this court in Re Kalb & Berger Manfg. Co., 165 Fed. 895. The order of the bankrupt court, restraining the prosecution of suit in the state court, is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Babb v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission (In Re Rhea)
17 B.R. 789 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1982)
Ohio Farmers Co-Op Milk Ass'n v. Clover Meadow Creamery Co.
198 N.E. 53 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1934)
Vass v. Conron Bros. Co.
59 F.2d 969 (Second Circuit, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
169 F. 1022, 94 C.C.A. 668, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roberts-ca2-1909.