In re Roberts
169 F. 1022, 94 C.C.A. 668, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4653
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 13, 1909·No. No. 247·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The state suit is brought against the Receiver and his. clerk personally. The question raised here has already been decided by this court in Re Kalb & Berger Manfg. Co., 165 Fed. 895. The order of the bankrupt court, restraining the prosecution of suit in the state court, is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Roberts, 169 F. 1022, 94 C.C.A. 668, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4653 (2d Cir. 1909).
169 F. 1022 (In re Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Babb v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission (In Re Rhea)
17 B.R. 789 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1982)
Ohio Farmers Co-Op Milk Ass'n v. Clover Meadow Creamery Co.
198 N.E. 53 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1934)
Vass v. Conron Bros. Co.
59 F.2d 969 (Second Circuit, 1932)