In re Robert Z.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Robert Z.

209 A.D.2d 813, 618 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11117

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 209 A.D.2d 813 (In re Robert Z.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Robert Z., 209 A.D.2d 813, 618 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Rensselaer County (Griffin, J.), entered February 22, 1994, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7, to adjudicate respondent a person in need of supervision.

Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating him a person in need of supervision and placing him on probation for a period of one year. Respondent contends that the petition should be dismissed because it violated Family Court Act § 732 (a) by failing to set forth specific allegations of misconduct so as to provide him with sufficient notice of the nature of the conduct underlying the petition that would allow him to [814]*814prepare a defense. Notably, this Court had been informed by the Rensselaer County Attorney’s office that petitioner concedes the relief requested by respondent. In light of this circumstance and our own review of the record, we accordingly reverse the adjudication order and dismiss the petition.

. Cardona, P. J., White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Rensselaer County (Griffin, J.), entered February 22, 1994, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7, to adjudicate respondent a person in need of supervision.

Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating him a person in need of supervision and placing him on probation for a period of one year. Respondent contends that the petition should be dismissed because it violated Family Court Act § 732 (a) by failing to set forth specific allegations of misconduct so as to provide him with sufficient notice of the nature of the conduct underlying the petition that would allow him to [814]*814prepare a defense. Notably, this Court had been informed by the Rensselaer County Attorney’s office that petitioner concedes the relief requested by respondent. In light of this circumstance and our own review of the record, we accordingly reverse the adjudication order and dismiss the petition.

. Cardona, P. J., White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D.2d 813, 618 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-z-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack