In Re: Robert Wolf and Aya Healthcare, Inc v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 6, 2024·No. 05-23-01305-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed May 6, 2024

S In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-01305-CV

IN RE ROBERT WOLF AND AYA HEALTHCARE, INC., Relators

Original Proceeding from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-23-19865

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Pedersen, III, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Nowell In this original proceeding, relators Robert Wolf and Aya Healthcare, Inc.,

seek a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to (1) refrain from enforcing “Category (b)” of the November 14, 2023 order and (2) require real parties in interest to respond to certain interrogatories and produce the documents and witnesses requested in relators’ motion for expedited discovery.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

After reviewing the petition, real parties in interest’s response, the reply, and the record before us, we conclude that relators have failed to demonstrate entitlement to the relief requested.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). We also lift the stay issued by our January 3, 2024 order.

/Erin A. Nowell/

ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE

231305F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Robert Wolf and Aya Healthcare, Inc v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

In Re: Robert Wolf and Aya Healthcare, Inc v. the State of Texas (In Re: Robert Wolf and Aya Healthcare, Inc v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)