In Re Robert W. Stencavage
This text of 2005 DNH 033 (In Re Robert W. Stencavage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Re Robert W. Stencavage 03/02/05 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In re Robert W. Stencavage______________ Opinion No. 2005 DNH 033
O R D E R
Robert W. Stencavage of Hollis, New Hampshire was ordered to
appear for jury duty on October 5, 2004. He failed to do so. He
was ordered to be available as previously ordered and on extended
dates. He appeared as ordered on October 18, 2004, but when
selected he reguested Judge DiClerico defer his service because
of the pressing needs of his business. Oasis Sunrooms and Spas.
Judge DiClerico granted his reguest and, after being assured by
Mr. Stencavage that he would be available in February 2005, he
ordered a deferment until February 2005.
Mr. Stencavage was ordered to appear on February 1, 2005. A
"show cause" order was issued directing Mr. Stencavage to appear
and show cause why he should not be fined or imprisoned for up to
three days for failure to appear for jury duty.1 At the hearing
I advised Mr. Stencavage that I would continue the hearing if he
wanted to appear with counsel. He declined.
Mr. Stencavage offered as cause for disobeying the orders
xM r . Stencavage demanded that the Clerk send notices certified and then failed and refused to pick them up after at least two notices by the post office. his involvement with Special Olympics basketball, his father's
condition, his brother's condition, the way Oasis Sunrooms and
Spas relies on his every day attendance, denial of his computer
calendar to him in the courtroom leading him to erroneously
telling Judge DiClerico that he would be available in February,
his inability to serve fairly because of his growing
disillusionment with government under the Bush administration,
etc. Finally, he suggested he could fit his jury duty in between
March 21, 2005 and April 30, 2005.
None of the justifications offered constitute "cause".
After being ordered by Judge DiClerico to jury duty in February
and being summoned, he made no effort to seek a further deferment
or to notify the court of his alleged unavailability. Mr.
Stencavage has demonstrated contempt of court orders and no just
cause for failing to appear for jury duty as ordered.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1866(g) Robert W. Stencavage is
fined $100.00 and imprisoned for twenty-four (24) hours
commencing at 9:30 a.m. on March 2, 2005. Stand committed.
SO ORDERED.
James R. Muirhead United States Magistrate Judge
Date: March 2, 2005 cc: Robert W. Stencavage
2 U.S. Marshal
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2005 DNH 033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-w-stencavage-nhd-2005.