In re Robert W.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Robert W.

278 A.D.2d 116, 717 N.Y.S.2d 537, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13990

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 19, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 116 (In re Robert W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Robert W., 278 A.D.2d 116, 717 N.Y.S.2d 537, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13990 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (John Hunt, J.), entered on or about October 19, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a finding that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 18 months with sex offender counseling and community service, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (John Hunt, J.), entered on or about October 19, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a finding that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 18 months with sex offender counseling and community service, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 116, 717 N.Y.S.2d 537, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-w-nyappdiv-2000.