In re Robert T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Robert T.

54 A.D.2d 581, 387 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13932

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 581 (In re Robert T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Robert T., 54 A.D.2d 581, 387 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13932 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 4, 1975, which, upon a determination that appellant was a juvenile delinquent, made after a hearing, suspended judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The hearing court was warranted in finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the object possessed by the appellant, characterized as a "saber like type of knife”, and a sword knife, with a 10- to 14-inch length, was a "dangerous knife” within the meaning of section 265.05 of the Penal Law (see People v Kinred, 18 AD2d 1086). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 4, 1975, which, upon a determination that appellant was a juvenile delinquent, made after a hearing, suspended judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The hearing court was warranted in finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the object possessed by the appellant, characterized as a "saber like type of knife”, and a sword knife, with a 10- to 14-inch length, was a "dangerous knife” within the meaning of section 265.05 of the Penal Law (see People v Kinred, 18 AD2d 1086). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 581, 387 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-t-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack