In re Robert T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Robert T.

54 A.D.2d 581, 387 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13932

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 4, 1975, which, upon a determination that appellant was a juvenile delinquent, made after a hearing, suspended judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The hearing court was warranted in finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the object possessed by the appellant, characterized as a "saber like type of knife”, and a sword knife, with a 10- to 14-inch length, was a "dangerous knife” within the meaning of section 265.05 of the Penal Law (see People v Kinred, 18 AD2d 1086). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 4, 1975, which, upon a determination that appellant was a juvenile delinquent, made after a hearing, suspended judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The hearing court was warranted in finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the object possessed by the appellant, characterized as a "saber like type of knife”, and a sword knife, with a 10- to 14-inch length, was a "dangerous knife” within the meaning of section 265.05 of the Penal Law (see People v Kinred, 18 AD2d 1086). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

In re Robert T., 54 A.D.2d 581, 387 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13932 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

54 A.D.2d 581 (In re Robert T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related