in Re Robert Samaniego

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 19, 2014·No. 04-14-00172-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00172-CV

IN RE Robert SAMANIEGO

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 19, 2014

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 13, 2014, relator Robert Samaniego filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus

along with a motion requesting this court to take judicial notice of adjudicative facts and a motion

for abatement to allow an evidentiary hearing in the trial court. Mandamus relief is only available

if the relator establishes both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and relator lacks an

adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex.

2004) (orig. proceeding). 2 The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12-0784-CV, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Mary Samaniego and Robert Samaniego, pending in the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable W.C. Kirkendall presiding. 2 We note that the issues complained of in this proceeding are also raised in relator’s appeal in Cause Number 04-13- 00519-CV presently pending before this court. 04-14-00172-CV

the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of

mandamus and the accompanying motions are denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Robert Samaniego, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

in Re Robert Samaniego (in Re Robert Samaniego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)