in Re Robert S. Howell, D.C. and First Rio Valley Medical, P.A.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO.03-02-00490-CV
In re Robert S. Howell, D.C. and First Rio Valley Medical, P.A.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
We deny relators' petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(4) (West Supp. 2002) (party may appeal interlocutory temporary injunction order); Tex. R. App. P. 28.1 (appeals from interlocutory orders will be accelerated); Reynolds, Shannon, Miller, Blinn, White & Cook v. Flanary, 872 S.W.2d 248, 251 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1993, no writ) (holding that party challenging temporary injunction has adequate remedy by accelerated, interlocutory appeal).
Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Filed: August 14, 2002
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Robert S. Howell, D.C. and First Rio Valley Medical, P.A. (in Re Robert S. Howell, D.C. and First Rio Valley Medical, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.