In Re Robert Otero v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 23, 2025
No. 04-24-00598-CV
IN RE Robert OTERO
Original Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
On September 9, 2024, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency relief.
After considering the mandamus petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Since the trial court’s order only requires disclosure of those documents relating to RLF’s representation of BIDACO and does not require production of documents relating to RLF’s representation of Otero in matters involving Associated Collision Center or Otero’s previous lawsuit against BIDACO, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. We lift the stay granted on September 11, 2024.
It is so ORDERED on April 23, 2025.
_____________________________ Velia J. Meza, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of April, 2025.
_____________________________ Caitlin A. McCamish, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 23230A, styled Loren Brown, Dean Davis, and Bill Mochel v. Robert Otero, pending in the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas, the Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Robert Otero v. the State of Texas (In Re Robert Otero v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.