in Re Robert Martinez
This text of in Re Robert Martinez (in Re Robert Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-16-00166-CR
IN RE Robert MARTINEZ
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 13, 2016
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
On March 29, 2016, relator Robert Martinez filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus
seeking an order from this court directing the clerk of the trial court to perform certain functions.
However, this court does not have jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. By statute, this court
has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in the
court of appeals district” and other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See
TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)-(b) (West 2004). Relator seeks relief against the clerk of the
court, not a district or county court judge and we conclude the requested writ is not necessary to
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 587693, styled The State of Texas v. Robert Martinez, pending in County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable John A. Longoria presiding. 04-16-00166-CR
enforce our jurisdiction in this instance. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Robert Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-martinez-texapp-2016.