in Re Robert L. Griffith
This text of in Re Robert L. Griffith (in Re Robert L. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILE COPY
In re Robert L. GriffithAppellant/s
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 28, 2014
No. 04-14-00199-CR
IN RE Robert L. GRIFFITH
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
On March 26, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s request for leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED AS MOOT. The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on March 28th, 2014.
____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 28th day of March, 2014.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013CR3530, styled The State of Texas v. Robert L. Griffith, pending in the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Raymond Angelini presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Robert L. Griffith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-l-griffith-texapp-2014.