In re Robert Kevin W.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Robert Kevin W.

127 A.D.2d 663, 511 N.Y.S.2d 783, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43149

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 9, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 127 A.D.2d 663 (In re Robert Kevin W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Robert Kevin W., 127 A.D.2d 663, 511 N.Y.S.2d 783, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In two adoption proceedings, the father appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Westchester County (Scancarelli, J.), both entered April 19, 1985, which, after a hearing, dispensed with the necessity of his consent for the adoption of each of his two sons.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record supports the Family Court’s determination that the father had abandoned his sons and that as a result his consent to the adoption of the sons by his ex-wife’s new husband was not required (see, Domestic Relations Law § 111 [2] [a]; Matter of Corey L v Martin L, 45 NY2d 383, 389). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In two adoption proceedings, the father appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Westchester County (Scancarelli, J.), both entered April 19, 1985, which, after a hearing, dispensed with the necessity of his consent for the adoption of each of his two sons.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record supports the Family Court’s determination that the father had abandoned his sons and that as a result his consent to the adoption of the sons by his ex-wife’s new husband was not required (see, Domestic Relations Law § 111 [2] [a]; Matter of Corey L v Martin L, 45 NY2d 383, 389). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 A.D.2d 663, 511 N.Y.S.2d 783, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-kevin-w-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack