in Re Robert Joseph Smith II
This text of in Re Robert Joseph Smith II (in Re Robert Joseph Smith II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 15, 2016
No. 04-16-00458-CR
IN RE Robert Joseph SMITH II
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
On July 21, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the trial court had not ruled upon two nunc pro tunc motions he filed in April, 2016. On August 10, 2016 the District Attorney for the 216th Judicial District filed an answer with this court generally denying the allegations contained in Relator’s Petition. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than August 30, 2016. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.
It is so ORDERED on August 15, 2016.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: _____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. A13660, styled State of Texas v. Robert Joseph Smith, II, pending in the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas, the Honorable N. Keith Williams presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Robert Joseph Smith II, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-joseph-smith-ii-texapp-2016.