in Re Robert James Watson, Relator
This text of in Re Robert James Watson, Relator (in Re Robert James Watson, Relator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-12-00152-CR
IN RE Robert James WATSON
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 21, 2012
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On March 12, 2012, relator Robert James Watson filed a petition for writ of mandamus,
asking this court to set aside the judgment and dismiss the indictment against him. However, in
a criminal case, in order to be entitled to mandamus relief relator must establish: “(1) he has no
other adequate legal remedy; and (2) under the relevant facts and law, the act sought to be
compelled is purely ministerial.” In re Reed, 137 S.W.3d 676, 678 (Tex. App.—San Antonio
2004, orig. proceeding) (citing State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d
924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001)). The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 11-1543-CR, styled State of Texas v. Robert James Watson, in the 274th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Gary Steel presiding. 04-12-00152-CR
opinion that relator has not established he is entitled to mandamus relief. Id. Accordingly, the
petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Robert James Watson, Relator, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-james-watson-relator-texapp-2012.