in Re: Robert James Fox
This text of in Re: Robert James Fox (in Re: Robert James Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-09-00131-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
§ IN RE: ROBERT JAMES FOX, RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
§
MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Robert James Fox has filed an “Emergency Petition for Declaratory Judgment” requesting this court to “promptly hear and adjudicate” the charge against him for allegedly tampering with a government record in violation of Texas Penal Code section 37.10. The jurisdiction of the courts of appeals is constitutionally and legislatively created. See TEX . CONST . art. V, § 6(a); TEX . GOV ’T CODE ANN . § 22.201(m) (Vernon Supp. 2008); TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. ANN . arts. 4.01, 4.03 (Vernon 2005). This jurisdiction, insofar as it relates to the merits of criminal cases, is appellate only. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. ANN . art. 4.03. The exercise of this jurisdiction involves reviewing judgments of lower courts. See Carter v. State, 656 S.W.2d 468, 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983). The entry of a declaratory judgment does not involve review of a lower court’s judgment, and no constitutional or statutory provision authorizes courts of appeals to enter such a judgment. Therefore, we are without jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. Accordingly, Fox’s Emergency Petition for Declaratory Judgment is dismissed. Opinion delivered June 17, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
(DO NOT PUBLISH)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Robert James Fox, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-james-fox-texapp-2009.