In Re Robert J. Villeneuve and Kelles Q. Kennedy v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Robert J. Villeneuve and Kelles Q. Kennedy v. the State of Texas (In Re Robert J. Villeneuve and Kelles Q. Kennedy v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued April 22, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00246-CV ——————————— IN RE ROBERT J. VILLENEUVE AND KELLES Q. KENNEDY, Relators
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION On April 7, 2025, relators, Robert J. Villeneuve and Kelles Q. Kennedy, filed
a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s March 20, 2025 “Order
on Petitioner’s Verified Petition to Take Deposition Before Suit,” allowing
petitioner/real party in interest, Casey A. Sue, as the Independent Executor of the
Estate of Cheryl Sue-Rabke and Trustee of the Cheryl Sue-Rabke Living Trust, to
take pre-suit depositions of relators pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202. Relators’ petition argues that the trial court abused its discretion by ordering the
pre-suit depositions.”1
Relators requested that this Court grant the petition for writ of mandamus and
direct the trial court to vacate the March 20, 2025 order.
In connection with its mandamus petition, on April 10, 2025, relators filed a
“Motion to Stay” the underlying trial court case as well as the trial court’s March 20,
2025 order pending the Court’s review of the mandamus petition. On April 15, 2025,
relators filed an “Emergency Motion for Consideration and Granting Their Motion
to Stay.” In their emergency motion, relators stated that Sue noticed the depositions
ordered by the trial court, set for April 16, 2025. Relators requested a stay of the
March 20, 2025 order to allow this Court to consider the mandamus petition. The
Court denied relators’ motions on April 16, 2025.
We conclude that relators have failed to establish that they are entitled to
mandamus relief, and therefore the Court denies relators’ petition for writ of
mandamus. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Morgan.
1 The underlying case is Casey A. Sue, as the Independent Executor of the Estate of Cheryl Sue-Rabke and Trustee of the Cheryl Sue-Rabke Living Trust v. Robert J. Villeneuve, NextGen3 Texans LLC f/k/a CERK Security LLC, and Kelles Q. Kennedy, Cause No. 524769-401, in the Probate Court No. 1 of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jerry W. Simoneaux, Jr. presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Robert J. Villeneuve and Kelles Q. Kennedy v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-j-villeneuve-and-kelles-q-kennedy-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.