in Re: Robert Fountain

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 1, 2007
Docket14-07-00088-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Robert Fountain (in Re: Robert Fountain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Robert Fountain, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 1, 2007

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 1, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-07-00088-CV

IN RE ROBERT FOUNTAIN, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On February 2, 2007, relator Robert Fountain filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  In the petition, relator asked this court to compel the Honorable Jim Wallace, presiding judge of the 263rd Judicial District Court of Harris County, to appoint new counsel for defendant.

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. We accordingly deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 1, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, and Justices Fowler and Edelman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Robert Fountain, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-fountain-texapp-2007.