In re Robert David L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Robert David L.

16 A.D.3d 508, 793 N.Y.S.2d 55, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2581

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 14, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.3d 508 (In re Robert David L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Robert David L., 16 A.D.3d 508, 793 N.Y.S.2d 55, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J), entered December 23, 2003, which denied her motion to vacate (1) a fact-finding order of the same court dated December 2, 2002, and (2) a dispositional order of the same court dated January 28, 2003, terminating her parental rights and transferring custody and guardianship of the subject child to the petitioner Suffolk County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption.

[509]*509Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Matter of Ayesha Shandeia McM., 255 AD2d 515 [1998]; cf. Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]). Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J), entered December 23, 2003, which denied her motion to vacate (1) a fact-finding order of the same court dated December 2, 2002, and (2) a dispositional order of the same court dated January 28, 2003, terminating her parental rights and transferring custody and guardianship of the subject child to the petitioner Suffolk County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption.

[509]*509Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Matter of Ayesha Shandeia McM., 255 AD2d 515 [1998]; cf. Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]). Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.3d 508, 793 N.Y.S.2d 55, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-david-l-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack