in Re Robert Crumps

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 20, 2009
Docket04-09-00252-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Robert Crumps (in Re Robert Crumps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Robert Crumps, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion





MEMORANDUM OPINION



No. 04-09-00252-CR


IN RE Robert CRUMPS


Original Mandamus Proceeding (1)


PER CURIAM



Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 20, 2009



PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On May 1, 2009, relator Robert Crumps filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial court's failure to rule on his pro se pretrial petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for speedy trial filed in the trial court. However, counsel has been appointed to represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which he is currently confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. See Robinson, 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule on relator's motion for speedy trial and his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus that relates directly to his confinement based on the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. Therefore, we conclude that relator has not shown himself entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition is denied. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Additionally, relator filed an Application for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus. No leave is required to file a petition for a writ of mandamus in this court. Tex. R. App. P. 52. Therefore, relator's motion for leave to file is DENIED as moot.

DO NOT PUBLISH

1. This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-1242, styled State v. Robert Crumps, pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patrick v. State
906 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Robinson v. State
240 S.W.3d 919 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Robert Crumps, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-crumps-texapp-2009.