in Re Robert Charles Smith

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 20, 2010
Docket03-10-00494-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Robert Charles Smith (in Re Robert Charles Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Robert Charles Smith, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-10-00400-CR

Robert Charles Smith, Appellant



v.



The State of Texas, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 90-594-K26, HONORABLE WILLIAM S. LOTT, JUDGE PRESIDING


NO. 03-10-00494-CV

In re Robert Charles Smith



ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N



In cause number 03-10-00400-CR, appellant Robert Charles Smith filed a notice of appeal from an order issued by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, dismissing his application for writ of habeas corpus. This Court does not have appellate jurisdiction over orders or opinions issued by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Tex. Const. art. V, § 5(a) ("The Court of Criminal Appeals shall have final appellate jurisdiction coextensive with the limits of the state, and its determinations shall be final, in all criminal cases of whatever grade, with such exceptions and under such regulations as may be provided in this Constitution or as prescribed by law."); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 4.04 (West 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

In cause number 03-10-00494-CV, Smith filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the trial court to take certain actions related to his appeal in cause number 03-10-00400-CR. Specifically, Smith seeks to compel the trial court to issue certification of his right to appeal, grant his motion to proceed without costs, order preparation of a free record, and appoint counsel to represent him on appeal. Because we dismiss Smith's appeal in cause number 03-10-00400 for want of jurisdiction, we dismiss his petition for writ of mandamus as moot.



__________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: August 20, 2010

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Robert Charles Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-charles-smith-texapp-2010.