in Re Robert Charles Kramer
This text of in Re Robert Charles Kramer (in Re Robert Charles Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-16-00132-CV ____________________
IN RE ROBERT CHARLES KRAMER
_______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 317th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. F-225237 ________________________________________________________ _____________
ORDER
Robert Charles Kramer (“Relator”) filed a petition for writ of mandamus.
Relator is a party in Cause No. F-225237, In the Matter of the Marriage of Robert
Charles Kramer and Nancy Lynn Kramer and in the Interest of S.L.K. Relator
seeks a writ compelling the Judge of the 317th District Court to vacate his
discovery rulings and orders requiring production of certain documents and
information. We note our jurisdiction over this matter and the parties. See Tex.
Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004).
1 Relator filed an emergency motion for temporary relief. Relator alleges that
prejudice will result if production of documents and information occurs before the
issues raised in the petition for writ of mandamus can be resolved.
The Court finds temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue prejudice. It
is ORDERED that the discovery pertaining to the production of Robert Kramer’s
personnel records, medical records, pharmacy records, and related requests made
by Nancy Kramer, including the deposition on written questions served upon Dr.
Luis Glenn Taylor, Dr. Kevin Dean, Malley’s Family Pharmacy, McMakin
Pharmacy, CVS/Pharmacy, Beaumont Bone and Joint Institute, and the request for
the cell phone records or the forensic examination, download, and review or
production of the cell phone is STAYED until our Opinion issues or until further
order of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of Relator
as a condition to any relief herein granted.
The response of the real party in interest, Nancy Lynn Kramer, is due May 5,
2016.
MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED.
ORDER ENTERED April 25, 2016.
PER CURIAM
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Robert Charles Kramer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-charles-kramer-texapp-2016.