in Re Robert Charles Kramer

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 25, 2016
Docket09-16-00132-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Robert Charles Kramer (in Re Robert Charles Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Robert Charles Kramer, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-16-00132-CV ____________________

IN RE ROBERT CHARLES KRAMER

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 317th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. F-225237 ________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

Robert Charles Kramer (“Relator”) filed a petition for writ of mandamus.

Relator is a party in Cause No. F-225237, In the Matter of the Marriage of Robert

Charles Kramer and Nancy Lynn Kramer and in the Interest of S.L.K. Relator

seeks a writ compelling the Judge of the 317th District Court to vacate his

discovery rulings and orders requiring production of certain documents and

information. We note our jurisdiction over this matter and the parties. See Tex.

Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004).

1 Relator filed an emergency motion for temporary relief. Relator alleges that

prejudice will result if production of documents and information occurs before the

issues raised in the petition for writ of mandamus can be resolved.

The Court finds temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue prejudice. It

is ORDERED that the discovery pertaining to the production of Robert Kramer’s

personnel records, medical records, pharmacy records, and related requests made

by Nancy Kramer, including the deposition on written questions served upon Dr.

Luis Glenn Taylor, Dr. Kevin Dean, Malley’s Family Pharmacy, McMakin

Pharmacy, CVS/Pharmacy, Beaumont Bone and Joint Institute, and the request for

the cell phone records or the forensic examination, download, and review or

production of the cell phone is STAYED until our Opinion issues or until further

order of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of Relator

as a condition to any relief herein granted.

The response of the real party in interest, Nancy Lynn Kramer, is due May 5,

2016.

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED.

ORDER ENTERED April 25, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Robert Charles Kramer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-charles-kramer-texapp-2016.