in Re Robert Caldwell

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 27, 2021·No. 09-21-00114-CV·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

NO. 09-21-00114-CV

IN RE ROBERT CALDWELL

Original Proceeding

Justice Court Precinct No. 1 of Polk County, Texas Trial Cause No. SC1822

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Robert Caldwell, filed an original petition for a writ of mandamus in which he requests this Court to compel the Honorable Darrell G. Longino, Justice of the Peace for Precinct Number 1 of Polk County, Texas, to vacate his July 1, 2016 order denying Caldwell’s motion for new trial in what appears to be a civil suit brought by Caldwell against the State of Texas.

Other than to enforce this Court’s jurisdiction, our mandamus jurisdiction extends only to a judge of a district court, a statutory county court, a statutory probate court, or a county court in this Court’s district. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §

22.221(b). Relator’s petition seeks mandamus relief against a justice of the peace. We do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a justice of the peace. In re Johnson, No. 09-09-00147-CV, 2009 WL 972977, at *1 (Tex. App.— Beaumont Apr. 6, 2009, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Relator neither argues nor demonstrates that the relief he requests is necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See Easton v. Franks, 842 S.W.2d 772, 773-74 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). Therefore, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.

PETITION DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on May 26, 2021 Opinion Delivered May 27, 2021

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Robert Caldwell, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

in Re Robert Caldwell (in Re Robert Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Easton v. Franks
842 S.W.2d 772 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)