in Re: Robert C. Morris

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 9, 2015
Docket12-15-00089-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Robert C. Morris (in Re: Robert C. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Robert C. Morris, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ia-15-ooo^-CO April 6, 2015 Twelfth Court of Appeals 1517 W- Front St., Ste 354 Tyler, Texas 75702 FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS 12th Court olAgP^alaDi^et RE: No. 12-14-00332-0/ Robert C. Morris v. Sherri Miliigan Et Ai. APR -9 2015 Petition For Writ ot Mandamus TYLER TEXAS CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK Dear Court Clerk/

Please find enclosed my Petition For Writ ot Mandamus to be filed and presented to the Honorable Court in the above staled numbered cause for consideration and ruling- On this date/ a true and correct copy has been served upon the General Counsel tor TDCJ, Respondents representative. A courtesy copy ot this petition also has been served upon the Asst Attorney General Patrick Brezik, who represents the Appellees in this matter. Please notify me of receipt and any decisions made by the Court please. Thank you for your time and assistance in this matter, it is greatly appreciated and welcomed.

Sincerely

C. Morris Reiator/Appellant Pro Se TDCJ-ID # i3110B3 Smith Unit 1313 CR 19 Lamesa, Texas 79331

enclosure(s): 1 cc: file Sharon F. Howell, General Counsel - TDCJ Patrick Brezik, Asst. Attorney General IN TEE

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS F'HD,iN cou^Fa7peaLI; TYLER, TEXAS

APR -g 2QJ NO. -12 14 00032 CV TYLER TEXAS CWW5JMSK, CLERK

ROBERT C. MORRIS

VS.

SHERRI MILLIGAN, ET AL

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

TDCJ-ID ft 1311083

SMITH UNIT

1313 CR 19

LAMESA, TEXAS 79331 IDENTITY OF INTERESTED PARTIES

RELATOR: ROBERT C. MORRIS

TDCJ-ID $ 1311083 SMITH UNIT 1313 CR 19 LAMESA, TEXAS 79331

COUNSEL: PRO SE

RESPCNDENT(S) ALBERT JIMENEZ

1313 CR 19 LAMESA, TEXAS 79331

VICKY BARROWS CINDI SIGSBEE

1060 E. HWX 190 E. HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS 77340

COUNSEL: SHARON FELFE HOWELL

OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL PO BOX 13084 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-3084

OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES: SHERRI MILLIGAN BRYAN GORDY CHRISTY HOISINGTON

COUNSEL: PATRICK BREZIK ASST. ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX 12548 AUSTIN, TEXAS 7 8711-2548 JUDICIAL NOTICE

Relator Robert C. Morris requests that this Honorable Court of Appeals takes Judicial Notice that the issue being presented in this Petition E'or Writ of Mandamus is the failure or out-right refusal of TDCJ Access To Courts Program personnel to provide necessary legal paper to prepare legal pleadings. The Rule of Appellate Procedure states that pleadings before the Court of Appeals be submitted on 8^x11 white paper, one-sided. This petition is being submitted on paper that was printed on one-side with a TDCJ provided legal form. Relator notice tor the Court to note is these pre-printed forms are tne only paper that the Relator was able to obtain to prepare and tile this petition. The reason being such as outlined in this petition, the inability to obtain and receive paper from the Respondents. IN THE TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS

ROBERT C. KORRIS §

vs § NO. 12-14-00332-CV

SHERRI MILLIGAN, ET AL. §

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

COMES NOW, Robert C. Morris, Relator Pro Se, in the above styled numbered cause and respectfully files and submits this his Petition For Writ of Mandamus and would show the Court the following for issuance of manaamus.

I.

RELATOR

Robert C. Morris, TDCJ-ID # 1311083, is an offender incarcerated at the

Smith Unit of TDCJ and ia appearing pro se, who can be located at 1313 CR 19, Lantesa, Texas 79331.

Morris is the Appellant in the above styled cause and is appearing pro se in that matter.

Relator has exhausted his remedies and has no other adequate remedy at law. The act sought to be compelled is ministerial/ not discretionary in nature. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I § 27 of the Texas Constitution provide that a person has the right to redress the government of grievances, known as "Access To The Courts Clause".

II.

RESPONDENT(S) Albert Jimenez, is the Smith Unit Access To Courts Supervisor, who in his capacity has a ministerial duty to provide TDCJ offenders with meaningful and adequate access to the courts pursuant to the Constitutions of the United States and Texas. Respondent Jimenez can be located and served at his place of business at 1313 CR 19, Lamesa, Texas 79331.

Vicky Barrows/ is the TDCJ Access To Courts Program Manager, who in her capacity has a ministerial duty to impliment necessary policies to provide TDCJ offenders with meaningful and adequate access to the courts pursuant to the Constitutions of the United States and Texas. Respondent Barrows can be located and served at her place of business at 1060 E. Hwy. 190 E., Huntsville, Texas 77340.

Respondent Cinoi Sigsbee, is the Regional Access To Courts Supervisor, who in her capacity has a ministerial duty to supervise TDCJ Units in providing TDCJ offenders with meaningful ano adequate access to tne courts pursuant to the Constitutions of the United States and Texas. Respondent Sigsbee can be located and served at her place of business at 1060 Hwy 190 E., Huntsville, Texas 77340.

The Respondents have representation by Sharon Felfe Howell, Office of General Counsel for TDCJ, PO Box 13084, Austin, Texas 78711-3084.

III.

VIOLATION OF TEE FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

The First Amendment ot the United States Constitution established "the

right of the people—to petition the Government for redress of grienvances." Thsi right is commonly known as "Access To The Courts Clause". The Fourteenth Amendment made the First Amendment applicable to the States. The United States Supreme Court established this 'Right' with regards to prisoners in BOUNDS v SMITH, 430 U.S. 343, 97S.Ct.1491, 52 L.Ed.2d 72 (1977). The Supreme Court stated "It is indisputable that indigent inmates must be provided at State expense with paper and pen to draft legal documents witn notarial services to authenticate them, and with stamps to mail them." ID at 824-825. VIOLATION OF ARTICLE I § 27 OF THE TEXAS CONSTIUTION Article I § 27 of the Texas Constitution provides "Tne citizens shall have right..-apply to those invested with the powers of government for redress of grievances or other purposes, by petition, address or remonstrance."

The Texas Department ot Criminal Justice (TDCJ) is charged witn the duties to execute the First Amendment and Article I § 27 of the nited States and Texas Constitutions, respectively. This is completed through the Access To Courts Program and implimented through various Board Policies and Admininstrative Directives.

The issuance of legal supplies (i.e., paper, pen, envelopes, postage) is directed by Board Policy 03.81 and Administrative Directive 14.09. Board Policy 03.81 is a general policy to provide notice of what and how supplies are to be made available to inmates. Administrative Directive 14.09 is a policy that provides detailed guidelines in the issuance ot legal supplies to indigent inmates.

Speciticiy, AD-14.09 provides: "Paper for legal/special correspondence shall not be limited, but shall be issued to indigent offenders based upon their presentation of a justifiable legal need (i.e./ court deadline, lengthy legal document). AD-14.09.III.C.3.a.3 (2010)

On February 24, 2015, Relator requested 180 sheets of paper on TDCJ form 1-302 and provided justification through the following information: case name: Morris v Milligan; case no. 12-14-00332-Cv; court: 12th Court of Appeals; pages in brief: 60; number of copies: 3; total: 180 sheets of paper. Respondent Jimenez issued only 35 sheets of paper. Relator filed administrative remedies, that provided no further action warranted at the Unit level. A step 2 grievance is still pending and is betore Respondent Barrows or Sigsbee, however such a decision can take up to 40 days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bounds v. Smith
430 U.S. 817 (Supreme Court, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Robert C. Morris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-c-morris-texapp-2015.