in Re: Robert C. Lowry, M.D.

511 S.W.3d 256, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 6694, 2015 WL 3958291
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 30, 2015
Docket05-15-00771-CV
StatusPublished

This text of 511 S.W.3d 256 (in Re: Robert C. Lowry, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Robert C. Lowry, M.D., 511 S.W.3d 256, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 6694, 2015 WL 3958291 (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by

Justice Lang-Miers

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting the Court order the trial court to set aside its orders finding relator in contempt of court and ordering him to pay attorney’s fees. Contempt orders that do not involve confinement may be reviewed by a petition for writ of mandamus. In re Long, 984 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex.1999) (orig.proceeding). In an original proceeding challenging a contempt order, the relator has the burden to show that the order is void. See In re Aslam, 348 S.W.3d 299, 302 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2011, orig. proceeding) (citing In re Coppock, 277 S.W.3d 417, 418 (Tex.2009) (orig.proceeding)). We conclude relator has failed to establish a right to mandamus relief. We deny the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Coppock
277 S.W.3d 417 (Texas Supreme Court, 2009)
In Re Long
984 S.W.2d 623 (Texas Supreme Court, 1999)
In Re Aslam
348 S.W.3d 299 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 S.W.3d 256, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 6694, 2015 WL 3958291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-c-lowry-md-texapp-2015.