in Re Robert Anthony Warden
This text of in Re Robert Anthony Warden (in Re Robert Anthony Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00444-CR
IN RE Robert Anthony WARDEN
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 21, 2020
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED AS MOOT
On September 10, 2020, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus complaining
of the trial court’s refusal to rule on his post-conviction motion for DNA/Scientific testing. On
October 2, 2020, the trial court provided this court with a copy of its October 2, 2020, order
denying relator’s “Motion for Post-Conviction DNA Scientific Testing.” Because relator has
received the requested relief, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 52.8(a). All other requested relief is denied.
Do not publish
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 14-022-CR-C, styled State of Texas v. Robert Anthony Warden, pending in the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable William D. Old, III presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Robert Anthony Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robert-anthony-warden-texapp-2020.