In Re Roberson

43 A.3d 443, 210 N.J. 220, 2012 WL 1959656, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 596
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 3, 2012·No. D-59 September Term 2011, 069729·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-262, concluding that the formal ethics complaint in Docket No. XIV-2008-045E filed against JAMES O. ROBERSON, formerly of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, and who has been suspended from the practice of law since April 26, 2002, should be dismissed, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal ethics complaint filed against JAMES O. ROBERSON in Docket No. XIY-200S-045E is hereby dismissed; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension imposed by prior Orders of this Court, until further Order, and shall continue to comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Roberson, 43 A.3d 443, 210 N.J. 220, 2012 WL 1959656, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 596 (N.J. 2012).

43 A.3d 443 (In Re Roberson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Lane
43 A.3d 443 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)