In Re Robbins
This text of 756 N.W.2d 711 (In Re Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Laurence Gee ROBBINS, Jr. and Brain Jamal Robbins, Minors.
Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Deonna I. Sanders, Respondent-Appellant, and
Laurence Robbins, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 1, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the May 1 and August 13, 2008 orders of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reinstatement of the respondent-mother's claim of appeal. The record does not demonstrate that the family court substantially complied with the court rules governing termination *712 of the respondent-mother's parental rights and notice of appellate rights.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
756 N.W.2d 711, 482 Mich. 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-robbins-mich-2008.