in Re Robbie Loftin
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-00070-CV
|
In re Robbie Loftin |
RELATOR |
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
Relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus concerned only his request for a judgment nunc pro tunc related to his felony driving while intoxicated conviction. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04(a) (Vernon 2003), § 49.09(b)(2) (Vernon Supp. 2010). Specifically, relator requested that the trial court’s judgment be corrected to show that he was convicted of a third-degree felony with punishment enhancements rather than a first-degree felony. After we requested a response to the petition, the trial court entered a judgment nunc pro tunc that classifies appellant’s conviction as a third-degree felony. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; MCCOY and GABRIEL, JJ.
DELIVERED: March 8, 2011
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Robbie Loftin (in Re Robbie Loftin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.