In re Roback

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Roback

741 A.2d 192

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 9, 1999

DocketNo. 26 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 741 A.2d 192 (In re Roback) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Roback, 741 A.2d 192 (Pa. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[193]*193 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 1999, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated October 13,1999, the Petition for Reinstatement in granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner in directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[193]*193 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 1999, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated October 13,1999, the Petition for Reinstatement in granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner in directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

741 A.2d 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roback-pa-1999.