In re Road in Peach Bottom Township

3 Pennyp. 541
York County Court of Quarter Sessions·Decided May 15, 1883·No. No. 71·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Pee Ctjeiam :

There is no error in this record. It was a case of review'. Due notice having been given of the time and place of meeting, and the two who [545]*545met having then and there duly adjourned tó a subsequent day named, was sufficient notice of the meeting on the latter day. As the law does not require the doing of a vain and useless thing, when the viewers decided not to confirm or establish a road to supersede the old road, they were not required to report specifically on the propriety of vacating the latter. The report against the new one was substantially a confirmation of the old road.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Road in Peach Bottom Township, 3 Pennyp. 541 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1883).

3 Pennyp. 541 (In re Road in Peach Bottom Township) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Division of Lansford Borough
21 A. 503 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)