in Re: R&L Carriers, Inc., R+L Transfer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 11, 2013·No. 05-13-01320-CV·Published

Opinion

Deny Writ and Opinion Filed October 11, 2013

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01320-CV

IN RE R&L CARRIERS, INC., ET AL., Relators

Original Proceeding from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-16041

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Francis Relators contend the trial judge erred in denying certain discovery requests. The facts

and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the

record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 136 (Tex.

2004) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and

motion for emergency stay.

/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS 131320F.P05 JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: R&L Carriers, Inc., R+L Transfer, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re: R&L Carriers, Inc., R+L Transfer, Inc. (in Re: R&L Carriers, Inc., R+L Transfer, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)