In re Rizov Corp.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois·Decided March 27, 2024·No. 23-13345·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) Case No. 23bk13345 ) Rizov Corp., ) Chapter 11 subchapter V ) Debtor. ) Judge Timothy A. Barnes

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ORDER AWARDING TO ROBERT P. HANDLER, SUBCHAPTER V TRUSTEE FOR IN RE RIZOV CORP., FOR ALLOWANCE AND PAYMENT OF FINAL COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES TOTAL FEES REQUESTED: — $7,020.00 TOTAL COSTS REQUESTED: — $0.00 TOTAL FEES REDUCED: $ 351.00 TOTAL COSTS REDUCED: $ 0.00 TOTAL FEES ALLOWED: $ 6,669.00 TOTAL COSTS ALLOWED: $ 0.00 TOTAL FEES AND COSTS ALLOWED: $ 6,669.00 ‘The attached time and expense entries have been underlined to reflect disallowance in whole or in part. The basis for each disallowance is reflected by numerical notations that appear on the left of each underlined entry. ‘The numerical notations correspond to the enumerated paragraphs below. (1) Unreasonable Time — TOTAL of disallowed amounts: $ 351.00 The Court denies the allowance in part of compensation for the indicated task(s) since the professional or paraprofessional expended an unreasonable amount of time on the task(s) in light of the nature of the task(s), the experience and knowledge of the professional performing the task(s), and the amount of time previously expended by the professional or another on the task(s). I” re Pettibone, 74 B.R. 293, 306 (Bankr. N.D. Il. 1987) Schmetterer, J.) (The Court will determine what is the reasonable amount of time an attorney should have to spend on a given project... An attorney should not be rewarded for inefficiency. Similarly, attorneys will not be fully compensated for spending an unreasonable number of hours on activities of little benefit to the estate.”’); In re Wildman, 72 B.R. 700, 713 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1987) (Schmetterer, J.) (same). As to the time devoted to the preparation of the fee application itself, the Court denies the allowance of compensation that 1s disproportionate to the total hours in the main case. In re Wildman, 72 B.R. 700, 711 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1987) (Schmetterer, J.) (“In the absence of unusual circumstances, the hours allowed by this Court for preparing and litigating the attorney fee application should not exceed three percent of the total hours in the main case.”’); In re Spanjer Bros., Inc, 203 B.R. 85, 93 (Bankr. N.D. IIL. 1996) Squires, J.) (compensation limited to 5%); see also In re Pettibone Corp., 74 B.R. 293, 304 (Bankr. N.D. IIL. 1987) (Schmetterer, J.) (ting Coulter v. State of Tennessee, 805 F.2d 146, 151 (6th Cir. 1986) (an nonbankruptcy cases, compensation for preparation and litigation of fee petitions limited to 3-5'% of the hours of the main case)).

The court will disallow $ 351.00 of the $ 735.00 requested for compensation of time devoted to the preparation of the fee application as exceeding five percent of the total compensation requested. SSS Dated: 03/27/2024 NN : ~ ‘Timothy A. Barnes United States Bankruptcy Judge

Commercial Recovery Associates Summary of Services Page 2 of 3 Print Date: 2/29/24 Date Consultant T Code Service Time Rate Fee 12/1/23 RPH B Zoom call with Rade Rizov and Saul Modestas to discuss options for making adequate protection payments, alternatives to running full fleet and background of financing arrangements with Taurus 0.50 450.00 225.00 12/5/23 RPH B Teleconference with Saul Modestas to discuss status with financial reporting and responses to pending motions for adequate protection 0.20 450.00 90.00 12/6/23 RPH D Court appearance on multiple creditor motions to lift stay and/or seek adequate protection 0.70 450.00 315.00 12/6/23 RPH Cc Review of pending motions for adequate protection/lift stay 0.30 450.00 135.00 12/6/23 RPH B Teleconference with Saul Modestas to discuss handling of upcoming motions for adequate protection 0.10 450.00 45.00 12/12/23 RPH Cc Review of proposed order for adequate protection for BMO 0.10 450.00 45.00 12/12/23 RPH A Review of debtor's projections as of 12--12-23 Modestas email with summary of proposed payments to secured creditors 0.40 450.00 180.00 12/12/23 RPH B Teams call with jeff Gansberg, Saul Modestas and Aaron Chapin to discuss issues with draft adequate protection order 0.10 450.00 45.00 12/12/23 RPH B Teleconference with Saul Modestas to discuss proposed payments to secured creditors 0.40 450.00 180.00 12/13/23 RPH D Court appearance on various creditor motions for relief from stay 0.50 450.00 225.00 12/19/23 RPH A Review of bank statements and 2022 tax retums for debtor and Taurus 0.60 450.00 270.00 12/19/23 RPH B Teleconference with Jeff Gansberg to discuss issues with debtor's projections 0.10 450.00 45.00 1/10/24 RPH B Teleconference with Eyal Berger, counsel for factor, to discuss current issues with debtor 0.30 450.00 135.00 2/22/2024 JS Cc Cursory review case details, review time entries, draft initial fee petition and send to Trustee for review 1.70 350.00 595.00 2/22/2024 LD Cc Update time spreadsheet details, prepare files for mailing send to Trustee 0.80 175.00 140.00 16.60 7020.00

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rizov Corp., (Ill. 2024).

In re Rizov Corp. (In re Rizov Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coulter v. State Of Tennessee
805 F.2d 146 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
In Re Wildman
72 B.R. 700 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)
In Re Pettibone Corp.
74 B.R. 293 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)
In Re Spanjer Bros., Inc.
203 B.R. 85 (N.D. Illinois, 1996)