In Re: Rivera
This text of In Re: Rivera (In Re: Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: ADRIAN RIVERA, Appellant ______________________
2015-1683 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014- 00042. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
SUDIP KUMAR KUNDU, Kundu PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant.
MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor, Michelle K. Lee. Also repre- sented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, MAYER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Rivera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rivera-cafc-2016.