In Re Ritter

60 N.C. 76
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1863
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 60 N.C. 76 (In Re Ritter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Ritter, 60 N.C. 76 (N.C. 1863).

Opinion

EeaesoN, C. J.

We are of opinion that the-circular, from the war department,, dated October 20, 1861, by which substitutes were allowed to be received .after the companies were formed and actually in service,, applies, by a liberal construe *78 tion, to tbe companiespvhile in the act of being formed or organized, or recruited, without the necessity of the details, which were made material by the fact that when the party was in service, and wished to put in a substitute, many circumstances had to be attended to, in order to prevent confusion — as the back pay or indebtedness of the principal and ' mode of getting home, and then to allow too many at a time, might disorganize the company; but when the companies were in the act of being organised, no considerations of that nature were presented, and the purpose was fully answered, by putting in an able bodied man for the war, and if proof can be made that these essentials were complied with, the object is fully answered when the substitute 'went into the service, and is still there, or has been killed, or disabled.

PER CubxaM, Petitioner discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDonald v. . Morrow
26 S.E. 132 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 N.C. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ritter-nc-1863.